[Ohrrpgce] SVN: james/3886 a work-in-progress editor definition file

[James Paige]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:26:44AM +1300, Ralph Versteegen wrote:
> On 14 October 2010 17:07, James Paige <Bob at hamsterrepublic.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:27:34PM -0700, Jay Tennant wrote:
> >> > From: James Paige <Bob at HamsterRepublic.com>
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:36 PM
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 07:23:23PM -0700, subversion at HamsterRepublic.com wrote:
> >> > > james
> >> > > 2010-10-13 19:23:23 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010)
> >> > > 42
> >> > > a work-in-progress editor definition file
> >> >
> >> > I am pretty happy with the RELOAD Editor. Has anybody else tried it yet?
> >> > (CTRL+R from the main menu in custom)
> 
> Yes I tried it out, I just haven't looked over all the code yet :)
> It's great! And since the change to make it automatically change type
> as you type, it's very nice to use.

Excellent

> I assume the multiline text entry is just a general RELOAD editing
> capability, and has nothing to do with the Editor Editor?

Yeah, I just wanted it to be possible to edit long lines, even though I 
don't expect any in the editor definition files.

> What was the complaint about intgrabber going "crazy" at high values?

Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. It is still doing it. When I was 
capping integer values at 32767, it was working fine, but when I started 
capping them at eh... 2 billion whatever, the max value for a signed 
32-bit integer, it started acting crazy when you cross the max value. 
Just type 9999999999999999999 to see it in action. Probably a simple 
overflow.

> I also notice that pasting a node value doesn't change the node type,
> instead failing to work.

Oops! I better re-do copy and paste rather than replying on the built-in 
copy and paste for intgrabber and strgrabber.

> I've just seen the editor crash twice after loading
> heroes.reld.editor, editing it, then going back to the RELOAD browser
> without saving. Other times it doesn't happen. I would post the
> backtrace, but it's huge.

Interesting. I haven't seen that yet. Maybe mail it to me off-list?

---
James