[Ohrrpgce] SVN: james/8448 Add new linux nightly build wrapper script

[James Paige]

On Tuesday, February 28, 2017, Ralph Versteegen <teeemcee at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 27 February 2017 at 15:19, Ralph Versteegen <teeemcee at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','teeemcee at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 27 February 2017 at 03:26, James Paige <Bob at hamsterrepublic.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bob at hamsterrepublic.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, February 26, 2017, Ralph Versteegen <teeemcee at gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','teeemcee at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26 February 2017 at 10:46, <subversion at hamsterrepublic.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> james
>>>>> 2017-02-25 13:46:27 -0800 (Sat, 25 Feb 2017)
>>>>> 43
>>>>> Add new linux nightly build wrapper script
>>>>> ---
>>>>> A   wip/nightly/wrap-nightly-linux.sh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great, so you have everything set up except Mac nightlies!
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Yep. I am still working on getting Mac OS X in a VM and ready to build.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It looks like you're not passing portable=1, right? But the nighlties
>>>> are linked to libncurses.so.5 anyway, so I guess they are built on an older
>>>> version of debian?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Debian Jessie
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I'm reading this right, but it looks like the 'stable'
>> version in debian is 5.9, while 'testing' and ubuntu use 6.0. I had thought
>> that ubuntu would use the same versions of packages as debian... actually I
>> don't really know what the difference between debian and ubuntu is.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Looking at build logs, I see that ixrat is building both x86 and x86_64
>>>> nightlies, while moggycellular is only building x86. There doesn't appear
>>>> to be any point to using moggycellular.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh! That is a pleasant surprise. Ixrat was previously only working for
>>> x86_64
>>>
>>
>
> My mistake... looking closer, it turns out that I overlooked the following
> line in the build log, what with stderr not being visible:
> scons: building terminated because of errors.
>
> Now that I can see stderr, I see the following:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSDL
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSDL
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSDL_mixer
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXpm
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXrandr
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXrender
>
> So ixrat wastes time compiling 32 bit builds and then fails at linking.
> Was it possible toinstall the 32 bit dev packages for these simultaneously?
>
>

I'm pretty sure I can't. I can try again later, and if it fails, I'll just
re-enable moggycellular

I'm kinda impressed at how fast these VMs run. And they don't even work my
CPU that hard.


>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The x86 nightly depends only on libncurses.so.5, while the x86_64 one
>>>> depends on both libncurses.so.5 and libtinfo.so.5 and hence doesn't run on
>>>> Slackware. I don't know why they differ. Hmm... recompiling FB with
>>>> -DDISABLE_NCURSES would be the easiest solution, but would affect unlump
>>>> and relump, so I'll have to check whether that's a problem.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I see that the x86 nightly still depends on
>>>> __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and hence a recent libstdc++.so, even
>>>> though it's compiled with -fno-exceptions, which works for me and for the
>>>> 64 bit nightly. So I guess I'll try using Mozilla's solution instead.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, most of the size of the linux and mac nightlies is
>>>> vikings.rpg, while only the Windows nightly installer has vikings; don't
>>>> know which way is better. I guess it's nice to have a nightly download
>>>> which is the complete package instead of having to extract over top of a
>>>> stable release...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, yes it might be a good idea to leave Vikings out of nightlies. I'll
>>> look into that.
>>>
>>> I also was thinking about retiring the deb packages for Vikings and
>>> Wander. I would really rather be building those with the "Export Game"
>>> menu, and not in the nightly build
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it would be good to consolidate all our packaging code.
>> I know that the distribmenu is still missing the ability to add icons to
>> .deb packages. I guess there's no way to include an icon or an installable
>> desktop link in a tar archive?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ohrrpgce mailing list
>> ohrrpgce at lists.motherhamster.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ohrrpgce at lists.motherhamster.org');>
>> http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.motherhamster.org/pipermail/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org/attachments/20170228/222636ce/attachment-0001.htm>